• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Bill4Time

Bill4Time

Legal Time Billing Software

  • Call Us: 877-245-5484
  • Features
  • Support
  • Sign-In
  • Get Started

Andrew McDermott

Tired of keeping time in Excel? The best Excel alternative

October 1, 2018 By Andrew McDermott Leave a Comment

excel-alternative

Timekeeping is hard.

It’s an important part of managing a successful firm. But it’s a practice that requires a significant amount of discipline and focus. That’s part of what makes it so difficult.

You’re focused elsewhere.

You’re focused on the briefs and documents you’ll need to write. The paperwork you need to file; the strategies and tactics you’ll need to use to protect your clients.

Your focus shouldn’t be timekeeping

Most attorneys know this.

At a fundamental level, most attorneys know results and outcomes matter more for their clients. But time is how you make your money. It’s how your firm brings in revenue.

So, you track your time.

It’s a task that’s difficult to perform accurately. Let’s say you’re in a client meeting. If you’re fully engaged, present and focused on your client’s matter you’re not focused on tracking your time. When you’re dialed in and focused on serving it’s easy to lose track of time.

There are exceptions of course.

If you’re meeting for a predetermined amount of time say, one hour, time tracking is easy. What if your meeting extends past the initial hour? What if you finish early?

Accuracy is suddenly more difficult.

The problem? Accurate timekeeping requires focus

As people, we’re bad at multitasking.

Many people feel they are excellent at multitasking and it’s true for a select minority. But it’s completely untrue for the vast majority of people.

The research is pretty clear on this.

Over and over we see that, as people, we’re bad at multitasking. Well maybe it’s just men – or women who are bad at multitasking?

No, it’s the majority.

We’re equally bad at multitasking. Attempting to multitask actually decreases productivity. What’s worse, research shows those who believe they’re better at multitasking are actually worse at it. Surprisingly, it damages our brain and career.

Why is this so important?

Here’s the fundamental problem with timekeeping.

  • If you’re focused on your client, you’re not tracking your time accurately
  • If you’re focused on timekeeping, you’re not focused on your client
  • Reconstructing your time after the fact is inaccurate and messy. It leads to overbilling and billable leakage

In my previous post, I showed that the research backs this point up as well.

As-it-happens timekeeping is the most reliable (and most profitable) method. The longer you wait, the more billable leakage (or overbilling) you experience.

  • You lose 10% of your billable time if you record time the day of, once a day.
  • 25% if you wait 24 hours to record your time.
  • 50% if you wait a week.

This is discouraging.

You absolutely need to track your time. Yet, doing so takes your focus away from clients (where it rightfully belongs). Focusing on clients means you’re not focused on accurately tracking your time.

How can you reconcile this?

The solution? Stop tracking your time altogether

This is ridiculous.

There’s simply no way you’ll be paid. If you neglect timekeeping you lose the ability to justify your invoices to clients. Which means they won’t pay.

Right?

Not exactly. I’m not advocating that you neglect timekeeping. I’m suggesting that you outsource timekeeping instead. This is the best alternative to excel timekeeping.

Automatic timekeeping.

This is the best alternative to excel. A reliable timekeeping system preserves accuracy. It gives you the as-it-happens reporting you need. It enables you to keep your focus where belongs.

On your client.

What makes this the best alternative to excel? Automatic timekeeping circumvents the usual problems and headaches that come with Excel timekeeping. When you automatically track your time you…

  • Avoid inconsistent skill sets. You no longer need to account for employees with novice, intermediate or advanced skill sets.
  • Eliminate meddling from “helpful” staff. You no longer need to worry about employees adding to or tweaking existing formulas in your spreadsheets.
  • Reduce financial harm dramatically due to billable leakage, overbilling or an increase in non-billable work. You avoid the $86,294 to $106,294 per person, per year [loss] that comes with relying on spreadsheets for timekeeping.

As I said before, focus is the fundamental problem.

The ideal timekeeping solution tracks time automatically whether you’re at your desk, on the road or out of town. It should automatically convert appointments into time entries, tracking both billable and non-billable work.

What if Excel is working for you?

Maybe it’s something you feel comfortable with.

Maybe you’ve customized spreadsheets to your liking, creating something that just works for your firm. If it’s actually working and you’re confident you’re not losing revenue, keep it.

But prove it to yourself first.

Do the calculations. Verify objectively that: (a.) You’re not losing money to billable leakage, errors and unnecessary non-billable work. (b.) You’re not overbilling your clients accidentally and (c.) You’re accurately keeping time and you’re getting paid for it.

It takes five minutes.

But, it’s a simple and straightforward way to confirm that spreadsheets are working for you and that you’re not losing money. Most firms are surprised at the results.

What about transitional pain?

You know, the pain that comes from learning how to use an unfamiliar system for the first time. The difficulty that comes with the unexpected.

It’s all about cost vs. benefits.

If the costs are nonexistent and the data shows your spreadsheets are performing as expected the decision is simple. As we’ve seen though, the costs, for most firms, is very high. If you’re looking to return to a place of growth and profitability some transitional pain may be necessary.

The ideal solution minimizes that pain.

To provide you with the handholding, training and one-on-one support you need to achieve immediate success. What does this mean exactly? It means your timekeeping system should:

  • Import existing spreadsheets and data for you
  • Integrate with the products and services you’re already using
  • Provide you with the primary, secondary and tertiary services you need
  • Offer free, one-on-one support
  • Supply you with customization options
  • Protect firm and client data in a format that’s compliant and secure

Things you simply won’t have with Excel.

Timekeeping in Excel requires focus

But, as we’ve seen, your focus should be timekeeping.

If you’re like most attorneys you know results and outcomes matter more for your clients. But time is how you make your money. It’s how your firm generates revenue.

So you track your time.

Attorneys are bogged down by non-billable work. When you focus on timekeeping you take your focus off your clients. Focus on your clients, and accurate timekeeping becomes difficult.

There’s a better way.

Automatic timekeeping gives you the set-and-forget skill set you need to track your time accurately, as it happens. Research shows this is the key to 50 percent more revenue. With automatic timekeeping you reduce financial harm dramatically. Your firms focus is fixed on what matters most.

Serving your clients.

The majority of attorneys spend an average of 2.3 hours on billable work, collecting on just 1.6 of those hours. Imagine if you were able to double, triple or quadruple your billable hours? It’s possible if you focus on the details that matter most.

Non-billable work is important.

But it isn’t where your focus belongs. The best alternative to Excel timekeeping is automatic. A solution that’s accurate, precise and consistent.

Manual timekeeping is hard.

Timekeeping – it’s an important part of managing a successful firm. It doesn’t have to be miserable, tedious or difficult. With the right solution and plenty of support you’ll discover the truth.

Your timekeeping is automatic and easy.

Try Bill4Time for free.

Filed Under: Blog, Running Your Business

Release Notes September 2018

September 28, 2018 By Andrew McDermott 1 Comment

The Bill4Time product team releases new and enhanced features, system improvements, and bug fixes several times per week. Organized by month, the Release Notes blog series will highlight all the changes we’ve implemented, so you can easily stay up-to-date on what’s new. If you have a question, feedback, or an idea – please leave a comment below!

Take a look at what we’ve released this September:

9/4/2018

Disabling an Account Manager – The developers have updated an issue where if a user was an Account Manager and was disabled, upon editing any of that user’s clients or projects caused the Account Manager to auto default to another user. This is now resolved for all users and browsers.

9/10/2018

Get Notified!  We are now beta testing our newest functionality –  Notifications.  You can now send emails to notify users and contacts of the following different account events – account balance,  billable amounts, billable hours, total hours, unbilled amounts, unbilled hours, expense totals, and trust balance.  Select the Alert Type of exceeding or falling below a set threshold for a window of time with a daily, monthly, weekly, each occurrence, or one time.

9/11/2018

Default Labor Label – The developers have corrected an issue where New Accounts were getting the labor mnemonic ‘Label’ by default.  This has been corrected.

9/26/2018

QB connector update – We updated our QuickBooks connector to accommodate an update made by QuickBooks for additional security enhancements. A new version of the QB Connector is available for download to resolve the issue with QuickBooks Online not syncing. You will want to uninstall the application first, then complete a clean reinstall from the Downloads page in the system.

9/27/2018

Don’t Quote us – The developers have identified and resolved an issue where if quotes were used in the Client name this caused issues when running reports and utilizing widgets on the dashboard.

Accessing the Bill4Time Support Help Site just got easier! – Now just enter your Bill4Time login information to access the Support Site.

API update – The last “Closed Date” for a project is now available through our API.

Click here to view August’s Release Notes

Question or comment about a change we’ve made?
Please contact Bill4Time Support by Email or phone: 877-245-5484

Filed Under: Blog

3 Reasons To Use Time Tracking and Billing Software Instead of Excel

September 28, 2018 By Andrew McDermott 8 Comments

excel-time-tracking-min

It feels like everybody uses Excel for time tracking.

Okay, maybe not everyone, but definitely the majority. Most legal professionals use Excel to track their time. It’s an industry standard. There are Excel templates everywhere.

Why use anything else?

This rationale makes sense. Most legal professionals are already using it. It’s cheap, free and widely available. Why go out of your way to work with something different?

Time tracking with Excel makes it easy to lose

But that’s not what you do.

You’re paid to win. Your clients, your firm and peers – they all expect you to win. Your firm expects revenue in the form of billables. Your clients expect you to perform, to produce results.

Excel makes that difficult.

In my previous post, I showed how Excel costs firms an estimated $86,294 to $106,294 per person, per year. This figure doesn’t even include the financial fallout from leakage/overbilling.

Remember those figures?

  • You lose 10% of billable time if you record time the day of, once a day
  • You lose 25% if you wait 24 hours to record your time
  • You lose 50% if you wait one week

Here’s the horrifying part about all of this. These are conservative estimates.

That’s right.

As a system, Excel is dysfunctional. It’s not just our bias talking here. It’s a simple fact that extends to all Excel users, regardless of industry or experience.

What does this mean for you?

If you’re looking to optimize and grow your firm Excel makes it harder. Does this mean you should use something else instead?

Absolutely.

In fact, I’m suggesting that you rely on specialized software.

Here’s why.

Reason #1: Inconsistent skill sets

Excel has a steep learning curve.

If you know what you’re doing Excel can be simple, straightforward and powerful. If you don’t know what you’re doing it’s incredibly easy to make a mess.

Here’s the subtle problem.

Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, OpenOffice, Zoho Sheets and Numbers – they all do things a bit differently. Sometimes these differences are minor sometimes they’re major.

Sometimes they’re incompatible.

The impact on your record keeping could be subtle or significant. It all depends on the spreadsheet you’re using. You’re essentially rolling the dice.

But it doesn’t feel that way…

Right?

What if associates upload/convert your Excel spreadsheet to Google Sheets and something breaks? What if they download and share their broken spreadsheet – as the original copy?

This sounds bizarre.

And it is until you realize these subtle (and frankly ridiculous) problems have cost you money. When that happens, it’s no longer a laughing matter.

Good software compensates for this. Your software should:

  • Be approachable. Novice, intermediate and advanced users should be able to perform simple and routine tasks quickly. With a bit of training, users should be able to perform their day-to-day tasks efficiently.
  • Come with support. Users should have direct access to additional help via email or phone. They should have access to a searchable knowledgebase that gives them instant answers to routine or common questions.
  • Encourage feedback. Your time tracking and billing software should grow with your firm. Ideally, your software should evolve over time, adapting to legal and industry changes.
  • Facilitate compliance. Are you LEDES compliant? Maybe your clients require that you use ABA codes? Good software makes it easy to maintain compliance. If you’re relying on spreadsheets this requires additional work. Additional non-billable work = less billable time.

This is easy to ignore.

These problems are so subtle, so common they feel downright ridiculous. Which is why they’re ignored.

So most firms lose money.

They lose a significant amount of money unnecessarily due to simple, yet correctable mistakes like these. 

Reason #2: Meddling, customization and updates

Let’s say your paralegal is an Excel power user.

She decides to make some upgrades to the Excel templates your office uses. This is the absolute worst thing she can do. It seems helpful on the surface, but it’s actually a productivity killer.

Here’s why.

Let’s say she adds advanced Excel formulas, pivot tables, macros and VBA scripts. Instantly, she’s able to make this Excel spreadsheet sing.

Does anyone else know how to use it?

What if a different user gets something wrong, triggers a macro accidentally or loses data? What if they remove or change something important?

Here’s an even bigger problem.

Your paralegal has just added advanced features to the shared template everyone uses. Best case scenario, she shows everyone in the firm how to use it. They’ll have to remember how to use it. And most importantly, they’ll have to follow her instructions explicitly.

What about future changes?

What if someone else decides the spreadsheet needs to be “updated?” What happens to the firm’s productivity then? How do you know you haven’t lost billables?

Great software avoids this nightmare. Software eliminates meddling by:

  • Protecting the firm’s productivity, guarding against saboteurs and helpful users with “great ideas.” This keeps your firm on the same page. Everyone uses the same software, follows the same system and is subject to the same rules.
  • Managing user rights. Owners, partners, associates and support teams shouldn’t have the same user rights. They should have user rights that are appropriate to their role in the firm. It’s doable in Excel but it requires confusing options that are pricey and completely unnecessary.
  • Focusing user attention. Users are focused on tracking their time and sending out invoices. They’re not wasting time on features or upgrades. Firm leadership spends more time replicating the success of top performers.

If you’re looking to hit billable targets this is key.

With the right software, partners, associates and support teams are focused on producing results. They’re not focused on unnecessary minutia.

Reason #3: No/poor version control

Here’s a common scenario.

It’s the end of the day. You’ve just added your billable hours to the shared Excel spreadsheet. You share an updated copy with the rest of your team. They add their time as well.

The next day you spot a major mistake.

You have three options:

  1. You take the time to manually update your spreadsheet, reducing your billable hours for today.
  2. You can revert to a previous version but doing that means your peers lose their work. They’ll have to resubmit their work from memory which, as we’ve seen, is less accurate.
  3. Save both the current and previous versions of your spreadsheet. This adds complexity and creates confusion as associates and support teams add their time to both spreadsheets.

See the problem?

These are all terrible options. They decrease your billable hours (and revenue). They increase billable leakage and increase the likelihood of overbilling.

Software circumvents these problems.

Ideally, the right software accomplishes several distinct objectives. It’s simple, clear and concise. With the right software, time tracking/billing should be:

  • Associates, partners and support teams are able to track their time automatically with the push of a button. This removes manual entry as a requirement, dramatically decreasing errors. The firm’s billable income skyrockets. Associates have less busy work and more time to meet firm targets.
  • Let’s say you schedule a client meeting for the 25th. Your time tracking/billing software should sync with your calendar. It should create an automatic time entry based on the appointments you’ve set. You should also have the ability to manually edit, update or adjust each time entry.

Good software manages these headaches automatically.

It gives leadership the access and control they need to manage billable and non-billable hours. That’s important even if, and especially when, relying on alternative fee arrangements.

Keep Time Tracking with Excel and you lose       

Excel costs firms an estimated $86,294 to $106,294 per person, per year. It’s a conservative estimate that doesn’t include:

  • Overbilling
  • Transitional pain
  • Inconsistent skill sets and
  • no/poor version control

As we’ve seen, the loss is significant. Most legal professionals rely on spreadsheets to track their time. It’s cheap, free and widely available. Who goes to the trouble of paying for software?

Winning firms do.

These firms fight to keep what’s rightfully theirs. Their revenue.

Great software does that.

If you’re looking to optimize and grow your firm Excel makes it harder. Great software makes growth and profitability easy, efficient and automatic.

The proof is in the data.

If it’s easy everyone will do it. Good software makes time tracking and billing easy. With the right software and outstanding support, your firm has everything it needs to boost revenue dramatically.

Skeptical?

See for yourself. Try our automatic time tracking and billing software free.

Try Bill4Time for free.

Filed Under: Blog, Legal, Running Your Business

How To Best Handle Multiple Contacts for Invoices

September 27, 2018 By Andrew McDermott Leave a Comment

multiple-contacts-min

Your client has an inconvenient request.

They want you to send invoices to multiple contacts. It’s inconvenient, messy and confusing. Does this mean you’ll need to accept payment from each of these contacts?

What about payments?

Are you expected to chase each contact for payment as each contact tells you to “speak with someone else?” It’s a hassle you’d rather not deal with. Why do you need to deal with these issues?

Your client expects you to, that’s why

Isn’t that the real reason?

Clients expect you to accommodate their every need. If you can’t do it you may not get paid. Or, they may decide to find someone else.

Which is frustrating.

It’s the old adage, whoever has the gold makes the rules. And your clients seem to be making all of the rules at the moment. Clients aren’t really all that focused on what you need at the moment, right?

Wait a minute.

What if we’re wrong about our client’s motives? What if there are other legitimate reasons for your client’s outlandish requests?

Why is that important?

Asking why gives you intel about the “what” and “how“

You need the why.

The why gives you a clear indication of your standing with clients and how to best approach the relationship. Let’s look at a few scenarios to show you what I mean.

Scenario #1: Budgeting

You’ve just landed a new corporate client. You’re working with a specific division. You’re doing great work, your client is pleased. They’ve requested your help on more complex matters. Your retainer has grown three times.

Then you’re hit with the usual request.

Please send a copy of the invoice to Jan the CEO, Marshall in accounting, or Howard in legal (who you’re working with).

Is this cause for alarm?

What happens if I can’t get Mitch to pay the invoice? Do I reach out to Jan? Or do I go to see Harrison? Is this simply because Jan wants to be in the loop? Or is this a control issue?

How to handle it:

This situation is straightforward yet delicate. Handle it wrong and you may burn bridges with people looking for a reason to replace you. How do you handle this situation properly? You ask each contact specifically about what they’re looking for.


Hi [client],

I noticed that you requested a copy of the invoices. Did you want a copy of just this invoice or all invoices moving forward? If you’re looking to stay in the loop I can also forward you the statement at the end of each month?

Let me know,

[your name]

Attorney


You can send a similar email to each of the contacts who’ve requested a copy of the invoice including Harrison in legal (your original point of contact).

Here’s why this works.

This is a direct approach. It’s not manipulative or dishonest. You’re upfront about what you’re looking for but you’re also providing each recipient an incentive to share. If specific recipients just want to be in the loop they’ll clarify their needs.

What if they don’t?

They’ll ignore you or give you a less than adequate answer, at which point you know. There’s a problem and it’s time to do some digging.

Scenario #2: Policy

You’re working with a corporate client that has a specific policy mandate. You’re working with multiple divisions in the company and you’re expected to keep multiple contacts in the loop as a matter of policy. Your client wants you to exclude each division from being listed directly and just wants the company name on the invoice.

How to handle it:

This situation is fairly straight forward. You keep each contact in the loop and you treat them as a single client on paper. You verify the person that’s actually responsible for paying the invoice. Then you treat each division as a separate client in practice.

What do I mean by that?

You cultivate a relationship with each of the people in your division. You provide them with the information they need. You go above and beyond, working to serve the team in each division. Then you work to expand the value you provide to each division.

Scenario #3: Flexibility

Your boutique firm has just been hired by a larger law firm. There are eight partners in the firm, and they all want copies of your invoice. You’re expected to go to accounting for payment, but every once in a while one of the partners pays the invoice.

Then the inevitable happens.

You send a payment reminder to accounting and you get the runaround. “Go see Gerald” So you go to Gerald. “Alison should be able to take care of that for you.”  Your clients, the partners, they all love your work. But they seem to be completely disinterested in handling the minutia of paying for your services.

It’s a difficult position to be in.

This has to be handled gently and with care. When clients don’t pay, anger and frustration is a natural response to the problem.

But it’s an unproductive one.

You’ll need to determine the kind of client you’re dealing with. Are you dealing with a client who is actually a deadbeat or are they simply a delinquent? Is it possible you’re dealing with an avoider?

Remember our terms?

  1. These are the clients who, for whatever reason, decide they don’t want to talk about money. They may decide against “the talk” ahead of time or when it’s time to pay. They may be embarrassed to discuss a financial problem, ashamed of something in particular or desperate to save face.
  2. These clients may be confused about the payment terms. Or, they may stop paying when they run into trouble. These clients often demand favorable billing terms (e.g. net 30, net 60) if they’re in dire straits, further complicating your cash flow dilemma. If they’re mistaken for deadbeats the client/firm relationship may sour.
  3. These clients have decided they’ll accept your hard work but they won’t pay your invoices. It could be an immediate problem but it’s more likely to become a gradual one. These clients respond to consequences, not empathy. They’re not interested in negotiating, they’re focused on evasion.

You’ll need to ask questions to identify the answer.

Here’s a simple strategy you can use to flush out an answer from your cagey clients. You ask group questions to everyone on your contacts list, like this:


Hi everyone,

I wanted to thank each of you for your help with getting me the necessary items I need for the deposition in March. I’m confident we’re set on that front.

I need help with a particular issue.

We reached out to accounting last week re: the outstanding invoice but we were told to check with the partners. I reached out each of you last week but I wasn’t able to get a conclusive answer on payment. Who should we contact about this invoice and all other invoices moving forward?

I’m looking for a single point of contact on this.

Best,

[your name]

Attorney


If you’re dealing with a group of avoiders, you’ll need to press firmly for a commitment. If you’re dealing with a delinquent, you may need to reach out to their support staff for more details. If you’re dealing with a deadbeat you may need to establish penalties for non-payment.

These aren’t the only reasons for multiple contacts

But it’s all about the why.

Multiple contacts exist for a reason. You’ll need to flush out the why to get to the what and how. If you want to know how to handle these issues, you’ll need an answer to the why question.

Clients aren’t always forthcoming.

They aren’t always eager to share this important information. It’s up to you to find the answer. Your client has an inconvenient request.

They want you to send invoices to multiple contacts.

Your clients expect you to accommodate their every need. They expect you to provide more value for less. The implicit statement is clear. If you can’t do things the way they need you to, you may not be paid on time. Your clients may decide to find someone else.

Start with why.

With the right approach and a bit of digging, you’ll uncover the why. Ask why and you’ll have the intel you need to handle the what and how.

Try Bill4Time for free.

Filed Under: Blog, Legal, Running Your Business

Resolving Unacceptable Payment Terms for Your Clients (without losing the client)

September 26, 2018 By Andrew McDermott Leave a Comment

unacceptable-payments

Unacceptable payment terms. It’s an easy way to lose good clients. Sometimes it’s a major issue for you, other times it’s an issue for your clients. Handle this thorny issue poorly and you lose your client.

How do you handle it well?

That’s a thorny issue that’s often addressed with generic advice, which frankly, isn’t helpful.

What do you do?

Do you know which client you’re dealing with?

When it comes to payment terms you’re dealing with three types of clients.

  1. These are the clients who, for whatever reason, decide they don’t want to talk about money. They may decide against “the talk” ahead of time or when it’s time to pay. They may be embarrassed to discuss a financial problem, ashamed of something in particular or desperate to save face.
  2. These clients may be confused about the payment terms. Or, they may stop paying when they run into trouble. These clients often demand favorable billing terms (e.g. net 30, net 60) if they’re in dire straits, further complicating your cash flow dilemma. If they’re mistaken for deadbeats the client/firm relationship may sour.
  3. These clients have decided they’ll accept your hard work but they won’t pay your invoices. It could be an immediate problem but it’s more likely to become a gradual one. These clients respond to consequences, not empathy. They’re not interested in negotiating, they’re focused on evasion.

Here’s why these distinctions matter.

The way you resolve unacceptable payment terms with your clients determines whether or not you’ll be paid for your hard work. It also determines when you’ll be paid.

Reasons to hire a lawyer

Profiling is key.

Treat delinquent clients like a deadbeat client and they’re far more likely to become one. Extend empathy and grace to deadbeat clients and you encourage abuse. Ignore avoiders and you won’t be paid.

Your clients aren’t created equal

Negotiation works best when you know who and what you’re dealing with.

Furthermore, you’ll find the 80/20 rule applies here. A minority of your clients produce the majority of your headaches and disputes.

This is good news.

The better you are at resolving unacceptable payment terms, the happier your clients will be. The better you are at profiling your clients, the better your cash flow will be.

It starts with payment terms.

What are unacceptable payment terms exactly? An unacceptable payment term is any arrangement you feel is unacceptable to your firm. That seems broad and very generic so let’s add some qualifiers.

Good payment terms…

  1. Are consistent with the standards you set and previously discussed with your clients. Hourly, retainer, fixed fee – the fee arrangement doesn’t matter. What does matter is consistency. You’re consistent with the standard you set.
  2. Are clear. It’s a good idea to verify that your clients understand the conditions of your payment terms ahead of time. It’s also important that you get a clear idea of your clients expectations regarding your payment terms ahead of time (e.g. I expect you to work with me if I run into trouble or I don’t talk about my financial problems).
  3. Depend on mutual consent. Were you bullied into net 60 terms to win business? You’re probably going to want to renegotiate, especially if clients take 90 or 120 days to pay. It’s the same for your clients. If they received unfavorable terms when they were desperate, they’ll want to (a.) renegotiate for more favorable terms or (b.) move on as soon as they’re able.

What if you’re working with them for the first time?

Same thing.

The first step is negotiating payment terms that are consistent, clear and agreeable to both parties. There’s just one problem.

The Yes.

Getting clients to say Yes is horrible, if you don’t know what kind of Yes you’ve received.

You want the Yes.

You want your clients to commit to the payment terms you’ve proposed. In fact, you don’t want the No. The No is what’s horrible. Yes is the only way you get what you need.

Which is why Yes is the problem.

Which yes have you received? Because there are actually three different kinds of “Yeses.” Do you know what they are?

  1. Counterfeit yes. The dishonest yes clients give knowing that they plan to renege on you later. They’ll claim their situation has “changed” or cite cutbacks. They’ll use this yes to get you to go away.
  2. Confirmation yes. It’s a reflexive response to black and white questions. It’s the yes we’re often tricked into giving. It’s an affirmation with no promise of action or results.
  3. Commitment yes. Genuine agreement that leads to action and/or results. The yes you give when you really mean it and fully intend to commit to a particular course of action.

What you really need is a No.

No leads to clarity. It shows you whether you’re dealing with an avoider, delinquent or deadbeat client. It gives you a clear path to follow. When you hear the word No does it mean they’re…

  • Not ready to agree?
  • Don’t understand (but are too embarrassed to admit it)?
  • Feeling uncomfortable?
  • Interested in an alternative or something else altogether?
  • Looking for more information?
  • Going to need to discuss things with someone else?
  • Not able to afford your services at all?
  • Simply not interested in working with you?

Only one of these is an explicit rejection. Which we automatically assume. But this isn’t what No actually is. No provides protection, gives us control, it helps us feel safe and secure.

How do you use No?

It’s simple. You lead with a simple question.

  • What about this payment arrangement isn’t working for you?
  • What payment terms would better for you?
  • Would _____ work instead?
  • What is it about these payment terms that doesn’t work for you?

Then you listen.

You give clients the unconditional positive regard they need. You give them the permission they need to say No. You create psychological safety. Give clients the attentiveness and respect they need and they feel heard. Understood.

Then, you summarize.

You repeat their words back to them, summarizing things in your own words. How do you know you’ve succeeded? When you hear a variation of the phrase “that’s right.” This tells clients they’ve been heard. It’s the breakthrough you need to address their core issues.

This all sounds like touchy-feely nonsense.

I hear you.

And you know what? It is. It is a bit touchy-feely. But it’s also something clients need. When they’re free to say No, they’re free to say Yes. To give you the commitment you really need.

Sounds cliché but it’s true.

Wait a minute. Does this mean you’re going to bend over backward and give clients whatever they want? Not at all. It means your clients are free to say No to your offer. Nothing more, nothing less.

This doesn’t resolve unacceptable payment terms

It’s true.

These strategies won’t work unless you have the missing ingredient.

An unknown, unknown.

It’s what risk analyst Nassim Nicholas Taleb calls the Black Swan. In this case, a Black Swan refers to game-changing knowledge, circumstance or events.

What does that look like?

  • Your client won’t pay unless things go their way (deadbeat)
  • They’ve run out of money (delinquent)
  • They’re angry with you and disappointed at how you’ve handled their case (avoider)
  • You humiliated them in front of their colleagues and they want to fire you, without paying (deadbeat)
  • Your client isn’t looking for resolution, they want to drag things out to bankrupt their spouse (avoider)

These are all game changers, aren’t they?

That’s the problem. Most attorneys receive generic advice. If clients agree to payment terms but fail to keep their word the advice is the same.

Follow-up, offer payment plans, sue if necessary.

These articles aren’t offering strategies that produce the long-term results you need. It’s generic advice that neglects the real problem.

The Black Swan.

You can find the Black Swan if you use the tactics I’ve shared so far. You can find it if you have the right strategy.

What if you don’t though? What if your client refuses to give you a No? What if you can’t find the elusive Black Swan? What if you do everything right and still fail to get the No?

You can’t resolve the problem.

You can’t fix these unacceptable payment terms.

You can resolve unacceptable payment terms

You can do it without losing clients.

It can be difficult to resolve. It’s a major issue for you, it’s an issue for your clients. Handle this thorny issue well and you’ll be rewarded with a Yes. The commitment Yes that produces the long-term results you want.

How do you get the Yes?

You start with No. Make it safe for your clients to say No. Give them the attentiveness, psychological safety and respect they want. Listen, then summarize. When you hear “that’s right” you’ll know you’ve succeeded.

Negotiation works best when you know who and what you’re dealing with. Profile your clients then draw out their No. Find their Black Swan and you fix the unacceptable payment terms.

Everything you need to keep good clients.

Try Bill4Time for free.

Filed Under: Blog, Legal

How Excel Costs You Time and Money

September 24, 2018 By Andrew McDermott 3 Comments

excel costs time and money.

Quick, take a guess.

What’s the fastest way to boost productivity, increase your firm’s revenue by 50 percent and strengthen client relationships? There’s a simple strategy you can use to achieve these results almost overnight.

Give up?

Dump your time tracking spreadsheets. If you’re using an excel spreadsheet to manage time tracking in your firm, you’re hurting your firm.

What a dramatic claim.

It certainly sounds that way but, as you’ll soon see, it’s really not. Your spreadsheets are doing subtle damage to your firm.

You’re being robbed by your excel spreadsheets

Time tracking is miserable.

It’s a necessary evil that’s part and parcel of legal work. It’s tedious busy work but it’s also how the firm makes its money. This is the problem.

The damage is so subtle the claim is almost unbelievable.

How can something as simple as time tracking spreadsheets lead to me losing a large client? Don’t misunderstand here. I’m not suggesting that spreadsheets are inherently evil.

I’m saying they’re dysfunctional.

That’s still a surprising claim. These excel spreadsheets add an unnecessary amount of complexity to a seemingly simple problem.

Tracking your time.

How time tracking spreadsheets steal from you

The danger is all around you.

There are a variety of sources that will provide you with excel spreadsheets that are formatted for you. All you have to do is use it. Other sources suggest that while spreadsheets are less than ideal, they’re still better than nothing.

It’s not much better.

Your time tracking spreadsheets do damage to your firm in a variety of subtle ways.

Okay, how?

If you’re filling out time tracking spreadsheets you’re losing money immediately.

A survey by Adam Smith Esq. and Smart Web Parts found that billable leakage costs firms $20,000 to $40,000 annually, per individual.

What does this mean?

A firm with 100 attorneys loses 2 to 4 million each and every year. This survey discovered that attorneys waste an average of 3.1 hours filling out timesheets each month. The survey used an average rate of 438 per hour which means…

Firms lose $16,294 per person, per year.

That’s significant when you realize that attorneys lose 6 hours per day on non-billable busy work each day.

It gets worse.

Excel spreadsheets create financially toxic habits

These habits strangle your firm slowly over time.

They create profitability barriers that making it extraordinarily difficult for firms to make money. I’m not talking about increasing revenue, I’m talking about keeping your clients.

I’m talking about delayed billing.

A study by Viewabill found attorneys who wait until the end of the month to record their time overbill their clients by 23 percent. This is a classic case of win the battle, lose the war. You cover memory gaps and make more in the short term, but you create distrust, anger and fear in your client.

Is it really a short term gain?

The research says no. A recent study from AffinityLive calculated that each person lost $50,000 per year. The culprit? Insufficient tracking of emails with clients and others. Almost 40 percent of respondents reported that they never tracked the time spent reading and responding to their emails.

Email isn’t the only culprit.

Firms lose an additional $50,000 per person, per year, all thanks to this one variable.

It gets worse.

A recent study by Ann M. Guinn for the ABA blog found that accuracy decreases with time. She conveyed a sobering story to demonstrate the point.

“Consider the story of Helene, a lawyer who is a client with my practice management consultancy. One of her biggest problems was getting her time recorded regularly. I had an appointment with her at 2:00 pm one day, and as we headed into her office, Helene’s assistant informed her that a client was on the phone.

Helene turned to me and said, “Do you mind if I take this call?” I told her I’d wait in the lobby. On a table next to my chair was a phone, and I could see that the light for her line was on. And it was on, and it was on, and . . . you get the picture.

When Helene finally came for me, I asked her if she had written down the phone call.

“Oh, right,” she said, and grabbed a piece of paper. She wrote out the date, the client’s name, the topic of discussion, then hesitated when it came to the time.

She said, “Let’s see, that was 20 minutes,” and wrote that on the paper.

I said, “Now, you see how easy that was? You bill $300 an hour, so you just captured $100 worth of time. At the end of the month, you’ll be able to bill that.”

She responded, “You’re right. I don’t know why this is so hard for me.”

I said, “The only problem is that you were on the phone for one hour and 40 minutes, so you just wrote off $400.”

She was incredulous until she looked at her clock and saw the truth of the matter. You may not be as far off on your guesses as was Helene, but the point remains—we rarely remember time accurately. ”

As uncomfortable as that was, it conveys an important point. Our memory isn’t always as reliable as we believe it to be. The research bears that out.

graph from the Harvard Business Review showing when you should fill out your timesheets

 

Tracking our time as-it-happens is the most reliable (and most profitable) method. The longer you wait, the more billable leakage you experience.

  • You lose 10% of billable time if you record time the day of, once a day.
  • You lose 25% if you wait 24 hours to record your time.
  • You lose 50% if you wait one week.

Imagine making 50 percent more simply by recording your time as-it-happens?

This is as bad as it gets, right?

These toxic spreadsheets continue to give (hurt)

These spreadsheets siphon more revenue from the firm via duplicate work and double entry.

Here’s a common scenario.

Your firm has multiple clients with multiple spreadsheets for each client. To complicate things even further, each associate has their own copy of the time tracking spreadsheet.

Still with me?

Who has the most up-to-date copy?

Is it you?

Did the other associates working on a client matter download your most recent spreadsheet? If they added their time to an old spreadsheet your most recent work is gone. The 15 hours of work you spent on your client’s case has vanished.

It’s an easy fix.

If you think to look for it. But there’s really no reason to. You’ve already recorded your time so you’ve most likely marked that as completed in your head.

No wonder you’re exhausted.

In the coming weeks, you’ll work even harder to meet your quota for the month. You won’t realize you already met the goal only to lose them to double entry and poor version control.

This is ridiculous.

Who uses spreadsheets or paper to track their time?

Primary research found…

  • 34% of attorneys kept logs on paper (yes, real paper)
  • 45% used desktop computers via spreadsheets
  • 06% used laptops
  • 48% used a tablet pc
  • 96% used a smartphone

And if they’re away from the office?

  • 27% kept their logs in paper
  • 4% used their laptops
  • 81% their tablets
  • 02% used their smartphones

See the problem?

The damage spreadsheets do to your firm? A quick back-of-the-envelope calculation will show you’re losing a significant amount of money. You’re working harder than you need to, all because your spreadsheets have added unnecessary complexity.

Maybe you don’t need to track your time

Maybe you rely on AFAs to bill clients or you’re an of-counsel attorney. There’s no need to record your time am I right?

Actually, no.

The ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct doesn’t specifically permit value billing. Courts have overruled carefully drafted AFAs.

Case in point?

A judge in the Delaware Chancery Court awarded plaintiffs $285 million. But before they could collect they needed to submit a written application which included details of its hourly billings.

Here’s the problem.

Every bankruptcy court in the country has rules similar to these which, as it turns out, approves every fee application (with the exception of special or previously approved cases). There’s no way around it then is there?

You need to track your time.

Your time tracking should be automatic

Want to increase billables by 50 percent?

Use automatic time tracking to increase your revenue, boost productivity and strengthen client relationships. If you’re using excel spreadsheets you’re losing time and money.

Time tracking doesn’t have to be miserable.

With the right time tracking solution you’ll be able to automatically convert appointments into time entries, tracking appointments automatically with the push of a button.

You’ll be agile.

With the right solution you’ll have a centralized, real-time tracking solution that’s lethal and precise. One that just works, whether you’re at your desk, working from home or out of the office.

It’s a dramatic claim.

But it’s a solution you can see for yourself. Ready to win back more of your precious time and hard earned money? Try automatic time tracking free for yourself.

 

Try Bill4Time for free.

Filed Under: Accounting, Blog, Legal, Running Your Business, Time Management

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Go to page 23
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 29
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

The best way to manage your practice online.

Topics

Recent Posts

  • What Is Attorney Time and Billing Software?
  • How Much Does Legal Billing Software Cost?
  • What Is the Best Attorney Time and Billing Software?
  • How Do Lawyers and Paralegals Keep Track of Their Time?
  • What Is the Best Time Tracking Software for Lawyers?

Copyright © 2025 · Genesis Sample Updated On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • Get Started
  • Vulnerability Reporting Policy